Dallas needs to find some shooters

Ian Levy of The Two Man Game wrote this morning that while Mavericks head coach Rick Carlisle has historically done a good job of tinkering with lineups to find the most effective unit, the starting group Dallas has run out since Dirk Nowitzki came back from injury has been terrible offensively and defensively.

The five-man group of Darren Collison, OJ Mayo, Shawn Marion, Dirk and Chris Kaman is being walloped to the tune of 14.5 points per 100 possessions, an embarrassingly bad mark especially considering the starting lineup should typically be one of the two or three best lineups on a team. The offense is especially lacking: Dallas ranks in the middle of the pack in terms of points per possession but the 94.3 mark the starting lineup produces would rank 3 points less than the Wizards and 8 points less than any other team. Luckily (I guess), the lineup’s defensive efficiency is only 1-2 points worse than the team average, so, there’s that.

The cause of this miserable situation on the defensive end is pretty clear: Kaman and Nowitzki are both slow on their feet and neither are outstanding rebounders, meaning the Mavericks’ bigs can’t guard big guys, block shots from little guys or end possessions by crashing the glass. That’s a recipe for disaster. However, the offensive problems are puzzling, as each of the five players are not inefficient players in their own right. (Levy points out Kaman’s true shooting percentage is his highest since 2009. While this might be true, the percentage is still pedestrian by NBA standards, even below the league average for centers who have played at least 20 games.) But as a unit, the group fails.

Below is a shot chart from Two Man Game that shows where this lineup’s field goal attempts come from. Note: The corner 3 and shots at the rim are the most efficient shots in the game, and many teams (the Spurs, most famously) take a majority of their shots from those locations.

Courtesy of The Two Man Game’s Flickr

Pretty striking numbers. The Mavs’ supposed best lineup has taken only seven corner 3s while on the floor. Not surprisingly, this lineup has taken an extremely high number of mid-range shots. That’s where Dirk thrives. But Dirk also defies most of the trends in the NBA. The key is surrounding him with players who can shoot from the areas Dirk rarely goes. A Kirk Goldsberry paper published last year charted shots from every single player in the league from 2006-2011, and calculated the percentages from each of those points. Here are the results. (Note: Red is good, blue is bad.)

Red indicates a high shooting percentage, while blue indicates an extremely low percentage. The size of the dot indicates the frequency with which teams shoot from that specific location.

The easy conclusion to draw: Shoot from the corners and shoot from the basket, because those are the easiest places to score. However, look again at the Mavericks’ shooting chart and you’ll notice Dallas almost never shoots from those places.

Why is it so important to balance Dirk with players who can shoot from those locations? Take a look at Dirk’s shot chart from the same time frame (bottom left chart on page 5 of Goldsberry’s paper). Dirk is brilliant from the left side of the court from mid-range and from the right elbow extended to the 3-point line. Take a quick peek back to the shooting chart above and you’ll notice that’s where most teams rarely ever shoot and rarely ever score. I’d guess Dirk’s buckets probably constitute a majority of the conversions from both of those locations. This, along with his size and ability to pass out of double-teams, makes him a matchup nightmare.  However, he should be the only Maverick shooting from that range.

Marion, Kaman, Collison and Mayo actually lead the Mavericks in shot attempts at the rim, but Mayo and Collison are the only two of the four who attempt more than one 3-pointer per game. Mayo, though he’s been slipping lately, is a good 3-point shooter. However, he and Collison rarely venture to the corner, where 3s are easier to make. Marion is one of the team’s worst shooters from distance. Basically, what this means is teams can clog the lane and leave Dallas’ guards and wings open for 3 while focusing on Dirk in the mid-range. Teams will let Kaman shoot because, although he’s shot well by his standards this season, he falls below league average in terms of true shooting percentage. Without the threat of the 3-point shot, it’s really, really hard to get to the basket in the NBA. Good luck scoring, Dirk!

What does Dallas need to do? At this point, the season is essentially over, so there’s no point in making a risky trade to try to acquire someone who can shoot from deep. Floor spacing is so incredibly important, especially when a team’s best player thrives in the middle of the court. Carlisle, a lineup magician (remember, it was his insertion of JJ Barea into the starting lineup that basically won Dallas the championship in 2011), can probably find a solution. Vince Carter is a more suitable option for Dirk than Marion, as Carter can shoot the 3. Kaman’s head injury might be a blessing in disguise, as Bernard James, an energetic shot-blocker, and Brandan Wright, Dallas’ smoothest inside scorer, will receive more playing time. Pairing Dirk with a more athletic big worked in 2006 and it worked in 2011, so why wouldn’t it work now?

Breaking up a pitiful lineup might not save the Mavericks’ season, but it will at least make the games a little more competitive, and might actually normalize Dallas’ shot distribution which will increase efficiency on the offensive end.

Well, that happened…

Memphis and Toronto have apparently reached an agreement on a trade, according to ESPN’s Marc Stein.

As I literally just wrote, the two teams will need a third to make the trade work. However, Stein writes it might be Detroit, as Dallas is hesitant to offer Vince Carter.

Okay, okay. I realize Carter has been playing extremely well (by his standards) lately. He’s averaged 13.6 points on 46% shooting during the last 10 games, and although he looked sort of shoddy last night, he’s picked up his game. However, if Vince Carter is the reason Dallas won’t chase after an extremely efficient pure point guard, we have some problems here.

Dallas should take a look at Jose Calderon

The Raptors are looking for a third team to jump into the trade discussions with the Grizzlies, according to Yahoo! Sports. Primarily, the third team would essentially just be a catalyst to absorb some salary from Toronto, namely point guard Jose Calderon, so the Raptors aren’t burdened with tax penalties throughout the remainder of the season should they acquire Memphis swingman Rudy Gay.

Calderon is due to make nearly $11 million this season, so it’d take a team that’s either willing to give up multiple players or one that has plenty of cap space to make a potential three-team trade work. Toronto appears to be chasing Gay desperately, which means the Raptors would conceivably take less back for Calderon’s expiring contract if it meant they could acquire the player they covet.

One third-team option? The Dallas Mavericks.

Dallas has needed effective and efficient point guard play all season. The Mavericks floundered without Dirk Nowitzki. However, since he’s come back from injury and found his stride, the offense has (mostly) run much smoother. Dallas has turned it over less than 13 times per game during the last 10 games. Of course, as Dallas found out last nightwhen you turn it over is more important than how many times you do. That’s where Calderon would come in.

Calderon’s assist ratio, according to ESPN.com, ranks tied for fifth in the NBA among point guards, though each of the four players ahead of him average less than 21 minutes per game. What’s more impressive is his 9.0 turnover ratio, which ranks with Chris Paul and is lower than all but two of the top 30 in the league. Darren Collison, by comparison, ranks 30th in assist ratio and 27th in turnover ratio. Nearly one-eighth of his possessions end in turnovers, even after the Mavericks’ recent stretch of efficiency.

He’s maintained at least a 4-to-1 assist/turnover ratio every season since 2008, playing for the most part on miserable teams that can’t score. He’s as pure a point guard as there is in the league, especially considering he comes at an affordable price. The only problem is he doesn’t score much, but the Mavericks hardly look for offense from point guards to begin with.

Several sports writers have tossed around potential trade scenarios using ESPN’s Trade Machine, and most of them look similar to this. Seems like a pretty fair deal for everyone involved. Toronto gives up Calderon’s expiring deal and Ed Davis, a forward full of potential, for a young, proven scorer in Gay. Meanwhile, Dallas offers Vince Carter and Rodrigue Beaubois to absorb Calderon’s hefty remaining salary. (Carter is personally one of my least favorite players, although he’s been playing extremely well lately. Each of Dallas’ top five most effective lineups during the past 10 games include him.)

Darren Collison will be a free agent at season’s end, and will likely command a much higher salary than Calderon. However, Dirk has been at his best while playing with point guards who don’t look to score first (Steve Nash, Jason Kidd). Sure, Nash and Kidd are all-time greats, but Calderon’s efficiency is practically legendary, even if it only comes for 10-15 minutes per half. It would do Dallas some good to sacrifice Carter and others for some extra ball security. Calderon would make Dirk’s job extremely easier, and judging from las night’s Portland debacle alone, he’d be worth it when it matters.

Not clutch in crunch time

Game-winner

Yep, that happened.

 

 

Here were Dallas’ possessions after taking a 101-94 lead against Portland with 2:19 left in a game the Mavericks led by 21 points in the 3rd quarter.

(1:48) Marion turnover: traveling (101-94)
(1:18) Mayo turnover: lost ball (101-96)
(:55) Mayo turnover: bad pass (101-96)
(:36) Nowitzki missed jumper (101-98)
(:11) Nowitzki made jumper (104-101)
(:01) Mayo turnover: offensive foul (104-104)

Okay, so four turnovers in six possessions is probably the worst possible way to end the game. But on the bright side, at least Dirk shot 50% from the field in the game’s final minute.

 

Does the hot hand exist?

A large part of my research into the Mavericks’ season will have to do with tracking shooting statistics and tendencies with the overall goal of ultimately solving the mystery of whether there’s such a thing as being “in the zone,” sort of mimicking work done by researchers at Stanford and Cornell in the 1980s. (For more, check my About page.)

I’m not the most technically savvy person when it comes to database management, so I’m using Excel to record every shot taken by every member of the Mavericks during the entire 2012-13 season, marking whether each field goal attempt was successful and also its relation to at most the previous three attempts each player has taken. The basic goal of the research is to determine whether making (or missing) anywhere from one to three previous shots influences the outcome of the next attempt. If a player has made two shots in a row, is he more likely to make the next shot? The public generally believes that players can find a rhythm or develop a “hot streak,” but what the researchers found in 1985 is that no such “zone” actually exists.

The game has certainly evolved since the 1981 season, and this part of my research will hopefully reveal whether or not significant changes in the way the game is played (such as the addition of a 3-point line, the decline of offensive centers and to a certain extent the demise of the mid-range game) have impacted shooting streaks. If a player shoots more frequently from further away, I would imagine his “zone” (if it exists) would be much more difficult to reach, and his successful field goal attempts would be scattered more randomly than they were in the early ’80s, when players relied more on interior and mid-range offenses. (Teams also scored many more points and field goal percentages were higher across the board, at least for the better teams in the league.)

Whether or not my research will result in the discovery of drastic changes to the original study is a question I won’t be able to answer until after the Mavericks play their 82nd game.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.